MDEA Amine regeneration column at an NGL plant in the Middle East was suffering unexpected acid gas corrosion with significant wall thickness reduction and pitting of up to 2.3 mm depth. A bespoke corrosion-resistant alloy was applied to freeze the current condition with no need for PWHT. After 5 years in service, the column’s wall thickness remained unchanged.
Amine Corrosion Discovery
During a scheduled shutdown inspection in April 2010, a worrying discovery was made inside an MDEA Amine Regeneration Column on the NGL train. The internal surfaces of the lower section of the column, fabricated from carbon steel, had suffered severe localized corrosion.
A significant wall thickness reduction was found beneath the trays. Pitting was identified, up to 2.3 mm in depth.
The root cause of this unexpected pitting corrosion was found to be tube failure in an associated upstream reboiler, which had led to the severe localized acid gas attack of the column shell in the area where the reboiler feed entered via an inlet nozzle.
Repair or Replace an Amine Column?
Both options would require significant capital investment and, more importantly, substantial production downtime and the associated massive cost due to production losses. The replacement was not a viable option due to the lead times.
Structural repair through an internal weld overlay could be considered. However, it would also require Post Weld Heat Treatment (PWHT) and a crane to support the column. The operational complications of performing such a procedure combined with the associated lead times (3 to 4 months) to carry out and complete the work were also considered highly unattractive.
Fitness for Service Engineering Analysis
A third-party engineering company carried out a full Fitness for Service Engineering Analysis of the column in its current corroded state. Based on the reduced shell thickness corrosion mapping report, the amine regeneration column passed the load combinations and the results proved to be within the allowable membrane stress limits. The calculated buckling factors were also above the minimum allowable limit.
Now that the asset owner had ascertained that the amine column was fit for use in its current condition, they had to ensure that no further metal loss occurred to the column shell pressure boundary. The current condition needed to be ‘frozen’.
The plant turned to Integrated Global Services Inc. (IGS) to apply a corrosion-resistant alloy using their High-Velocity Thermal Spray process. HVTS would be used to upgrade the internal surface metallurgy of the column to a bespoke Hastelloy, to provide an enhanced corrosion barrier and ‘freeze’ the metal condition. IGS can deliver an internal Corrosion Resistant Alloy (CRA) cladding on a process vessel in-situ without the need for PWHT.
Your Emergency is Our Routine!
By 2010 IGS already had a local presence in the Middle East, having completed various applications and projects at local refining and petrochemical plants. IGS equipment, materials, and personnel are permanently stationed in many countries.
IGS can, therefore, be available to carry out HVTS applications on short notice with immediate mobilization to the site following the urgent request from the asset owner.
Learn more about IGS on-site Thermal Spray Coatings
Amine Column Surface Preparation
In line with IGS safety culture, a thorough JHA and HSE review was completed prior to the initial inspection of the corroded and pitted surface area to be protected with a corrosion-resistant alloy. IGS then recommended mechanical works to achieve the necessary surface acceptance criteria. Once this was completed, the surface was abrasive blasted to the required surface preparation standard.
Once the surface preparation was completed, the bespoke modified Hastelloy was applied using the IGS HVTS conveyance system, following the safety, application, quality and inspection procedures outlined in the Method Statement and project documentation. The IGS HVTS application was completed, inspected and the amine column trays replaced before the column was boxed up in May 2010.
Following the application, the amine regeneration column was closely monitored and inspected both externally and internally to demonstrate that the remaining shell pressure boundary was maintained. When, after 2 years the wall thickness had not changed, the asset owner canceled the order for the new column and continued operation.
The IGS service in 2010 saved the asset owner both the combined capital expense to replace or structurally strengthen the amine column and the associated operating expense of an extended unplanned shutdown that would have been required to carry out the installation and commissioning of a new one.
In addition, it enabled the NGL plant to subsequently engineer, procure and commission two new columns adjacent to the existing one and tie these in at the end of 2015 with minimum interruption to production. In total, it is estimated that these combined savings amounted to approximately $40 million for the plant.